| April 7, 2021

Clinic receives national CLEA award for excellence

UGA Law School’s First Amendment Clinic, along with UGA’s Community HeLP Clinic and four other clinics from Harvard, Columbia, Texas A&M, and Boston University, were chosen as the 2021 recipients of the Clinical Legal Education Association (CLEA) award for “Excellence in a Public Interest Project.”

Keep Reading
A close up image of a gold pen about to write on an amicus brief paper.
| December 1, 2020

Amicus victory in Open Records Act appeal

A close up image of a gold pen about to write on an amicus brief paper.

The Clinic achieved an amicus victory in Love v. Atlanta Falcons Stadium Co., LLC where the defendant company voluntarily handed over 1,500 pages of documents sought by the plaintiffs under Georgia’s Open Records Act (ORA) rather than wait for the Georgia Court of Appeals to likely order the documents to be produced.

Keep Reading
A blue screen with a large button titled "Block" at the center with a mouse clicker over it.
| November 1, 2020

Bohanan v. Robinson

A blue screen with a large button titled "Block" at the center with a mouse clicker over it.

The First Amendment Clinic settled a lawsuit against Douglas County Commissioner Kelly G. Robinson for blocking a county resident from his interactive Facebook page that he used to communicate with the public about his official activities after she criticized his response to constituent concerns.

Keep Reading
Over the shoulder view of a person holding a smartphone with the Facebook app on the screen.
| September 18, 2020

Online censorship: public officials blocking citizens on social media

Over the shoulder view of a person holding a smartphone with the Facebook app on the screen.

A critical mass of courts — including the three Circuit Court of Appeals to have so far addressed the issue — find that it constitutes unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment for a public official who operates an interactive social media account in their capacity as a state actor to deny individuals access to that account based on dislike of or disagreement with their speech.

Keep Reading
| April 7, 2021

Clinic receives national CLEA award for excellence

UGA Law School’s First Amendment Clinic, along with UGA’s Community HeLP Clinic and four other clinics from Harvard, Columbia, Texas A&M, and Boston University, were chosen as the 2021 recipients of the Clinical Legal Education Association (CLEA) award for “Excellence in a Public Interest Project.”

Keep Reading
A close up image of a gold pen about to write on an amicus brief paper.
| December 1, 2020

Amicus victory in Open Records Act appeal

A close up image of a gold pen about to write on an amicus brief paper.

The Clinic achieved an amicus victory in Love v. Atlanta Falcons Stadium Co., LLC where the defendant company voluntarily handed over 1,500 pages of documents sought by the plaintiffs under Georgia’s Open Records Act (ORA) rather than wait for the Georgia Court of Appeals to likely order the documents to be produced.

Keep Reading
A blue screen with a large button titled "Block" at the center with a mouse clicker over it.
| November 1, 2020

Bohanan v. Robinson

A blue screen with a large button titled "Block" at the center with a mouse clicker over it.

The First Amendment Clinic settled a lawsuit against Douglas County Commissioner Kelly G. Robinson for blocking a county resident from his interactive Facebook page that he used to communicate with the public about his official activities after she criticized his response to constituent concerns.

Keep Reading
Over the shoulder view of a person holding a smartphone with the Facebook app on the screen.
| September 18, 2020

Online censorship: public officials blocking citizens on social media

Over the shoulder view of a person holding a smartphone with the Facebook app on the screen.

A critical mass of courts — including the three Circuit Court of Appeals to have so far addressed the issue — find that it constitutes unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment for a public official who operates an interactive social media account in their capacity as a state actor to deny individuals access to that account based on dislike of or disagreement with their speech.

Keep Reading